Design Triptych with Oliver Reed
January 12, 2008
Exploit context
Own the rules to engagement
Always be available
Zero influence
Processes in Free Media – Obstacles in Media Commerce
Tweets-
Recent Comments
- Wiki News
-
-
-
- The Main RSS
- That Was Not OK November 12, 2009
- @cjhurst I'll raise that job ticket with the editorial dept. November 12, 2009
- kevinmarks: interesting that VCs are investing as angels says @fredwilson - mixture of relationships help - portfolio theory of investors? #defrag November 12, 2009
- kevinmarks: says @fredwilson web video looks a lot like TV - monetizing like old TV with ads needs reinvention - something new will be better #defrag November 12, 2009
- kevinmarks: now @fredwilson says demographic targettign of ads is key on FB - but we gave up demographics for intent targetting with @google #defrag November 12, 2009
- kevinmarks: surprised how angry @fredwilson got about the scammy ads - virtual currencies are interesting but many are iffy too - non-fungible #defrag November 12, 2009
- kevinmarks: here's the OpenSocial virtual currency spec for @bfeld et al http://bit.ly/4p84Ug #defrag - we're already trying to converge this November 12, 2009
- @cjhurst So, somthing like this ok? http://bit.ly/3RLBCi #DGR November 12, 2009
- @cjhurst p.s. make sure you press the 'Drive' button. http://bit.ly/3RLBCi #DGR November 12, 2009
- @cjhurst Thanks Chris. Street View yes. AR iphone/Android with #Layar or simular is the real target #DGR November 12, 2009
- @cjhurst ooh, soundtracks - now that's a thought. Last.fm mash with google streetmap. #clarksonDGRs November 12, 2009
- DGRs Narrative paths (sneak preview). http://bit.ly/Ob1u via @Laundryman @KidBeats November 12, 2009
- @rachelclarke not 100% sure - @tomhimpe has the details. Tom? November 12, 2009
- oooh, I'm rly looking forward to talking at FOE MIT next week - great pre-planning chat with the guys there - deep dives #purefold #dgrs November 12, 2009
- What to do in Berlin this evening. BloodSweatVector. November 12, 2009
- Discussing DGRs bot with MIT Future of Entertainment team. Gonna be presenting them next week in Boston. November 12, 2009
- he's off wandering again. http://bit.ly/2KgJgX November 12, 2009
- @TheKaiserII @robmyers #DGRs with legs in London E8. http://bit.ly/2KgJgX @Laundryman working on it now. November 12, 2009
- breitenbach: @thekaiserii there is a question for you about streamtelling http://bit.ly/Tr1GC November 12, 2009
- An Almanac of Human Emotion. http://bit.ly/3UIXkg November 12, 2009
- Clippings
- Is this how the singularity happens?
- Think I might go to a matinee & see Ghost of Girlfriends Past today....☎ if interested in joining me! [feedly]
- Asylum
- Monk Leaves Footprints Ingrained In Floor
- Crappy Balloon Art
- Expanding Flexibility
- 20,000 words this week. Yawn.
- Reenacting Objects
- The Museum of Jurassic Technology
- Moonwalk (2008) - Pash*
-
Fresh on Flickr
![[Page 227] Stephen Wolfram: A New Kind of Science | Online](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3642/3507361849_5caa3d8dae_t.jpg "[Page 227] Stephen Wolfram: A New Kind of Science | Online")
More Photos - Wordie!
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
-
January 13, 2008 at 11:36 am
Attribution?
Although I’ve no doubt seen the middle movie before I can’t remember it’s name.
As you are undoubtedly aware, attribution is not a commercial privilege to be compelled on threat of copyright infringement, but a matter of respect. I worry that CC licences are beginning to persuade everyone otherwise.
I could look up the movies of Oliver Reed on IMDB, but a title would at least provide a memorable term of reference for members of your audience (in so far as it exists).
Or will you argue that the aesthetics of your triptych would be spoilt by the appearance of a footnote?
It is possible that your Flash player provides all the details of each clip, but mine gives no clue whatsoever.
This reminds me of another disadvantage of copyright, no-one will detail the crime of their infringement (uploading a copyrighted work to YouTube without permission) for fear of compromising plausible deniability, or making the crime more visible and giving the clip a consequently shorter lifespan.
I look forward to the day when artists can build upon each other’s published work without having to pretend devotion to original thought or divine inspiration, inevitably having to disclaim any pollution of source materials through misappropriation.
January 13, 2008 at 5:54 pm
Yo Crosbie
If you click the YouTube video player it takes you through to the source file. Don’t shoot me down, I’m just the messenger.
I’ll add footnotes if you really want, but who get’s the attribution?
January 13, 2008 at 6:39 pm
These are works of art exhibited in your gallery. Clicking through several times in order to open a new window is getting close to beware of the leopard.
And yes, you are the messenger, and should indeed be shot if you neglect appropriate credit to the sources of your message.
I still don’t know the title of the movie…
Just the title, that would do. Enough information so that the viewer has an easy clue to pursue its provenance.
E.g. (1) Aspel interview, (2) Movie title, (3) Spitting Image.
January 13, 2008 at 6:55 pm
o0o0oooooh, the things I do for you Crosbie.
To save you a click through, the movie in question is “The Assassination Bureau”
IMDB entry is here.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064045/
I like your attribution format – consider it appropiated, erm, adopted rather.
January 13, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Excellent!
Now, I can tell you how much I enjoyed your triptych.
Very nice.
ENCORE!
January 13, 2008 at 11:34 pm
I’ll keep ‘em coming then.
Perhaps I should take requests? Any suggestions?
Coming up is:-
Snoop Doogy Dog
Germaine Greer
Quentin Tarantino
Pete and Dud
Matt Groening
Larry David
…and many many more, as they say in the design business.